6 Comments
User's avatar
Jeff Knepper's avatar

IT/OT Insiders, you nailed the requirements and scope. Very grateful for your updated vendor list and am excited how we can all work together to provide better solutions for manufacturing. Well done guys. Hope we have a chance to talk data modeling, knowledge graphs, and MCP in the near future.

Expand full comment
David Ariens's avatar

that sounds like a plan ;)

Expand full comment
Brian McCarver's avatar

I haven't fully internalized the map, but on first pass the coverage of the platform looks a lot like Rhize to me. I know the IT/OT Insider doesn't promote specific products per se, so forgive me, but that is what came to mind. I keep coming back to that platform. Does your team know of other market offerings that fit the platform as the map describes? I understand if you aren't comfortable mentioning specific market offerings.

Expand full comment
David Ariens's avatar

Thanks for your comment, Brian!

Rhize is definitely a platform which ticks many (if not most) of these boxes.

Other platforms (without starting to name all of them) also have quite an extensive list of capabilities while others focus on some specific niche capabilities (eg Data Quality).

What I've seen myself is that for many customers, it makes sense to take a look to their current install base first + map what they want to do in the Data Consumption part and then try to figure out if they can do that by staying in the vendor ecosystem they have or not.

Expand full comment
Andrea's avatar

Great to see the map evolving, great work! In the Capability Map 1.0 I was missing the M2M type of capability for execution of actions leveraging ML/AI models. You've definitely "closed the loop" here!

Expand full comment
David Ariens's avatar

Thanks !

And you are absolutely right. We needed to close the loop :)

Expand full comment